AOL File Library: 4,701 to 4,800/aol-file-protocol-4400-4701-to-4800.zip/AOLDLs/Social Issues & Comments/Please let the kids pray/kidpray.txt

Text File | 2014-12-11 | 31KB | 542 lines

PLEASE, LET THE KIDS PRAY (5/94)

           The following is from a recent edition of Christian
            Crusade Newspaper, P.O. Box 977, Tulsa, OK
            74102. The newspaper is in its 42nd year of
            publication. Dr. Hargis can be E-mailed on
            America On Line as BJHargis, on Compuserve at
            72204,541, and via the Internet as
            [e-mail] .

            Permission is granted for this article to be used in
            newsletters, on computer BBSs or  other otherwise
            published, provided that attribution to Dr. Hargis
            and Christian Crusade Newspaper is included.

            copyright 1994 Christian Crusade Newspaper.
            All rights reserved.

from CHRISTIAN CRUSADE NEWSPAPER
by Dr. Billy James Hargis, publisher
Keith Wilkerson, editor

Hundreds of students nationwide this month are expected to present
their schools with a simple request.
     The kids want recognition of God returned to their graduation
ceremonies.
     In western Virginia, before commencement programs last year,
hundreds of students protested what they said were illegal and un-
American bans on graduation prayers with walkouts, petition drives
and rallies -- one in a football field, another in a supermarket parking
lot.
     In Westchester County, N.Y., hundreds of teens signed a petition to
include "a tasteful reminder of the presence of God" in the graduation
ceremonies at John Jay High School in Cross River, N.Y.
     When a class valedictorian included a prayer in his speech at a
Robertson County, Tenn., high school, the crowd joined in, then gave
the boy a standing ovation.
     A baccalaureate service for Leslie, Mich., High School included
scriptural readings and a short prayer. "We weren't trying to make a
religious statement," said Tom Urban, president of the Leslie school
board. "We made the decision based on the traditions of this area. We
wanted to get the senior class together for one final time and send it
off with an inspirational message." The service was presided over by
the Rev. Thomas Bump of Leslie First Baptist Church and featured
one scriptural reading, a short sermon and a prayer. Held in the school
gym, the baccalaureate was school sponsored and school board-
approved. Graduates weren't required to attend, but 80 of 93 seniors
came.
     However, in Wellsville, Kan., high school officials canceled plans for
invocation and benediction prayers after the American Civil Liberties
Union threatened to sue. Just down the highway in Emporia, the
national anthem was sung after the graduation procession, a time
reserved for prayer in past years. In Pittsburgh, Penn., the ACLU filed
a lawsuit in federal court to stop a student-led prayer at Upper St.
Clair High School's graduation ceremony.
     In Iowa, a federal judge granted the frantic Iowa Civil Liberties
Union a temporary restraining order blocking two school districts
from allowing student-led prayers, although students had voted 105-
10 in favor of prayers.
     But in Idaho, U.S. District Judge Harold L. Ryan ruled that allowing
students to decide whether to include prayer in graduation
ceremonies was constitutional. Student-led prayers also were held to
be constitutional by the 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in New
Orleans. On the other hand in Berlin, N.H., high school Principal
Bruce MacKay said an invocation was dropped when the ACLU
threatened to sue. In Georgia's Richmond County, Superintendent
John Strelec canceled the traditional baccalaureate service.

Some schools leave it up to kids
     Elsewhere, officials allowed students to make the decision. "The
seniors met, without me or any other member of the administration
or faculty, and voted to have a prayer at the beginning of graduation,"
said Principal Thomas Fairbanks in Gettysburg, S.D. "The seniors are
doing exactly what we've been told is legally acceptable."
     In Tennessee, Blount County schools let students decide whether
they wanted prayer. In Milton, Mass., the school board said clergy
would be allowed to speak at graduation, but only after signing an
agreement they would not pray or mention any deity. In
Elizabethtown, Ky., high school senior Amy Clark was told she could
start a graduation service by praying for her classmates as they enter
adulthood, but she couldn't use the word "God."
     "Now who are we praying to: to whom it may concern?" Patti
Stewart, the mother of one of the graduates, asked The Courier-
Journal of Louisville.
     In Sevier County, Tenn., Principal Bruce Wilson of Seymour High
School said prayer was included in ceremonies there because "some
things are right to do, and some things are not right to do, depending
on the community. We're a community school, and we're a reflection
of what our community wants."
     Students at Medina, Ohio, High School circulated petitions to the
school board meeting, asking it to allow student prayers on the
graduation program. Officials at several other small Ohio school
districts in rural areas near Akron, such as Black River schools in
Medina County and Chippewa Schools in Wayne County and
Springfield schools in Summit County, said they have no intention of
interfering with students praying at graduation exercises.
     Other Ohio school officials, however, vowed to obey the Supreme
Court ban on allowing kids to pray.

Texas commissioners send out a message
     Banning prayer in the public schools has helped unravel America's
moral fiber, spiritually depriving an entire generation of this nation's
youth. That is what is proclaimed by a resolution recently passed by
the County Commission of Galveston County, Texas, and 131 other
Texas counties.
     Although the commissioners do not oversee the public schools and
although their prayer resolutions do not change the law, they are
sending out a message, says Denton County Commissioner Scott
Armey. Kids, teachers, administrators and parents know where their
commissioners stand.
     And so do Congressmen, says Armey. He says having Texas' county
commissioners on record endorsing school prayer just might
embolden U.S. Senators and Representatives to fight to return prayer
to the classroom.
     The Texas commissioners are not alone in their concern. "Saying
America's youth need to be guided by a higher purpose, hundreds of
lawmakers around the nation, from black urban liberals in
Washington to white rural conservatives in Mississippi, are seeking to
return prayer to public schools," reports Washington Post staff writer
William Booth.
     "The movement has generated school prayer legislation in the
District and at least six southern states," wrote Booth. "Lawmakers,
claiming that American public education has lost its moral bearings,
insist that in a country where metal detectors are ubiquitous in
schools, students deserve the right to hear the word 'God' again.
Indeed, the resurgence of school prayer seems to be just one of a
handful of 'values issues' being given renewed life by Republicans and
Democrats alike, including President Clinton.
     "The new laws are being pushed by big-city liberal politicians as
well as by traditional members of the religious right. The liberals
include Georgia state Sen. David Scott, a Democrat from Atlanta,
whose other big issue this year is stricter gun control."
     "There is now this extraordinary need to provide our young people
with a way to look into themselves for strength and meaning," said
Scott.

Americans want the right to pray
     "It has nothing to do with being a liberal or conservative, a
Democrat or Republican, black or white," said Tennessee state Sen.
Don Wright, a Republican who championed his state's prayer
legislation last year. "The people want the right to pray. They want
that right back again."
     "We're bringing back to our children the recognition that there is a
place for spiritual and moral enlightenment," said Florida state Rep.
Beryl Burke, a Democrat who represents Miami's mostly black
Liberty City neighborhood. "The whole country is realizing that there
were decades when God was left out of our society. We're seeing the
error of our ways, and returning to what was good."
     High school students gathered around their schools' flagpoles last
fall on campuses around the nation, celebrating and publicizing a
three-year-old Supreme Court decision ignored by the national press
which actually allows student-sponsored prayer groups in public
schools.
     "There is just one word for it -- awesome," said Cameron Lane, who
attended a gathering at Johnson High School in Savannah, Ga.
     Brent Moody, a senior at Mount Zion High School in Clayton
County, Ga., near Atlanta, said it was "about time we as Christians
stand up for what we believe in and go out and tell the world."
      "Organizers said more than 1 million students participated in the
meetings, which were held around the flag poles of public high
schools before classes began," reported Robert Naylor of the
Associated Press. "The meetings started in Texas after the U.S.
Supreme Court ruled in 1990 that public high schools generally must
allow student prayer groups to meet and worship if other student
clubs are permitted to meet at school."
     The justices said such extracurricular prayer meetings do not
violate the constitutionally required separation of church and state if
high school religious groups are given the same access accorded other
student activities.

ACLU determined not to let it happen
     However, the American Civil Liberties Union is fighting the
student-led prayer circles, calling them a step backward from the
brave new world that the ACLU has envisioned for America in the last
25 years. In Michigan, the American Civil Liberties Union asked state
school superintendent Robert Schiller to discourage students from
attending the rallies. But Schiller said he believed the students had a
constitutional right to participate.
     Sponsors and backers said they had to convince school officials in
other areas.
     "A lot of school districts and a lot of school administrators argued
that it violated the separation of church and state, that you can't have
students praying on campus," said Jay Sekulow, an Atlanta lawyer who
argued for the winning side in the 1990 case. "But our position is that
it was voluntary, it was student-led and it was protected."
     Students said the rallies draw the attention of other students, but
it's not always approving. "People will come up to you and say, what a
Jesus freak," said Samantha Clark, a Brunswick, Maine, high school
sophomore who organized a rally.
     But she said the prayer service "makes the day go better. It just
gives us strength."
     And strength is one thing that public school students need these
days.
     "During a single week last month in the District of Columbia public
schools, two high school students were shot and seriously wounded,
another student was stabbed by a sixth-grade girl, an assistant
principal was punched in the face, and a policeman was assaulted by
students," wrote Richard N. Ostling in Time magazine. "Mayor Sharon
Pratt Kelly responded to the mayhem as big-city mayors often do: she
announced plans to post 60 more cops on campus.
     "But her predecessor in the job is convinced that a higher power is
required. Ex-mayor and now councilman Marion Barry has proposed a
law allowing students to lead nonsectarian classroom prayers. 'Maybe,
just maybe, it will turn some of our values around,' he says. 'We've
lost our way.'

Ex-mayor calls for prayer in schools
     Barry served six months in prison for drug possession after he was
caught in a sting operation. He might "seem a curious proponent of
piety," chuckled the Time article, "but his campaign is no oddity.
Pressed by voters, legislators around the U.S. are probing for
loopholes in Supreme Court rulings that have forbidden mandated
school prayers along with 'moments of silence' to foster praying.
     "These efforts come, moreover, at a time when the court is re-
examining a cornerstone of its rulings on church and state: the so-
called Lemon test, which has forbidden virtually all government
involvement with religion."
     The 1971 Lemon ruling bars tax support for salaries and secular
textbooks in religious day schools. The decision set up a three-part
test to determine whether a government action is an unconstitutional
infringement of church-state separation.
     To be legal, an action must:
     Ñ have a ''secular legislative purpose,''
     Ñ avoid ''excessive government entanglement with religion'' and
     Ñ have a ''primary effect'' that ''neither advances nor inhibits
religion.''
     Many legal experts and religious leaders feel that the Lemon test is
at best confusing, at worst unfair, and in any event destined to change.
     The nationwide, grass-roots campaign to welcome prayer back into
America's schools is also aimed at a weak link in the Supreme Court's
anti-prayer rulings: the court has never expressly stated whether
voluntary student prayers are permissible.

Christians have to fight to pray
     The Court has already overruled lower court decisions that used the
primary-effect criterion to outlaw voluntary religious clubs in public
schools, rental of public schools to churches on the same basis as
other community groups, and help for blind and deaf students
attending religious schools. All are permitted, according to the high
court.
     However, each ruling required long and difficult legal battles by
Christians yearning for their children again to have the right to pray in
freedom.
     At every turn, they have been met by ridicule in the news media. A
classic example would be a noxious column in the Washington Post
by Richard Cohen who proclaimed sarcastically that the notion "that
America has slipped its religious moorings and even become hostile to
religion" is nothing but "fiction." He went on to poke fun at Christians,
who he seem to claim that "the entire nation has been zoned Sodom
and Gomorrah -- a capitalist-communist hybrid in which profit is
permitted but religion banished."
     He then laughed at the idea "that if only the government got
behind religion more, all sorts of wonderful things would happen.
Illegitimacy would diminish, crime would abate, welfare would be
reduced ╔ The assertion is that more religion in our lives would
return us to the halcyon days of yesteryear.

Media has fun mocking the idea
     "The constant bleat for values and religion," he wrote, "borders on
the whimsical to suggest that America's problems are basically
spiritual when they are more importantly economic and social. It is
even a worse folly if we get to the point where a dreamy nostalgia for
a mythical religious era is substituted for some hard thinking."
     However, America has tried Cohen's point of view and found it
wanting. Another Washington Post writer, Steve Twomey also found
the idea of returning prayer to our schools hilarious. In his column, he
told the following:
     "So a guy brushes up against a guy on a Metro bus in Silver Spring
and gets shot for it. So a teacher tries to disarm a Largo student and
gets shot for it. So a student argues with a student at a District high
school and gets shot for it. So a ... Aw, you know the litany of our
moral degeneration.
     "Shall we pray?
     "'I believe,' Marion Barry was saying, 'in the power of persistent
prayer, persistent and repeated prayer.'
     "Never doubt a man back from the political dead," wrote Twomey.
"His Former Honor, now the council member from Ward 8, called
back one day last week after attending a workshop on prayer in public
schools, a workshop that focused, in part, on him. He's so enamored
of prayer as an elixir that he has proposed a bill to allow students in
the People's Schools to pray openly on the job.
     "'Prayer ought to be everywhere,' Barry said, 'at work, at school, at
church, at home. Let's not box it in. It's wrong to box it in.'
     "He meant he wants prayer that's organized. Not by school officials.
That would mix church and state, something we have long frowned
upon. But if students, who aren't representatives of the government,
decide -- presumably by vote -- that they want to pray as a group on
school time, they should be able to do so, M.B. said. He doesn't mean a
moment of silent reflection. He means say-it-loud, say-it-proud
prayer.
     "'Our young people,' he said, 'need to do it for themselves and do it
for others to hear.'
     "In the classroom?" asked Twomey.
     "'Of course.'
     "What about a student who doesn't want to pray?
     "'You don't have to sit there. ... It won't take long.'
     "And the assumption," asked Twomey, "is that this wouldn't
infringe on his First Amendment right to worship or not, as he sees
fit?"
     "'It works.'" answered Barry. "'That's the assumption. ... (And) you
might catch the spirit by listening to those who pray.' He said young
people grow up with ugly videos, gangsta rap, violent movies. 'They
need to hear a different message. They need to see a different
message.'
     "Amen to that," wrote Twomey. "Amen to much of what Barry says
about prayer's value."

Free speech and equal access
     A mail campaign spearheaded by Christian lawyers at the Virginia
Beach-based American Center for Law and Justice has sent every high
school principal and attorney general in America literature urging that
such prayers be allowed as an expression of ''free speech'' and ''equal
access to the marketplace of ideas.''
     Daily drive-by shootings, jails packed with juvenile offenders, and
what is generally recognized as a serious breakdown in the nation's
moral values is fueling much of the state legislative activity as well.
Georgia has enacted a law to permit moments of silence. Student-led
prayers have been approved in Mississippi, Arkansas, Tennessee and
Virginia. Similar legislation is under consideration in at least six more
states.
     Congress has caught the fever this year as well. Both the Senate
and House at one point passed measures that would strip funds from
schools that forbid ''voluntary'' prayer. Eventually, the enforcement
element of the bills was removed, turning the measures into federal
suggestions with no teeth. However, Congressmen endorsed the
legislation with great hoopla and undoubtedly will cite their pro-
prayer votes on this fall's campaign literature.
     In almost all cases, state chapters of the American Civil Liberties
Union and affiliated groups threaten to challenge the constitutionality
of the new laws, citing decades of Supreme Court precedent declaring
public school prayer a breach in the wall separating church and state.
     Proponents of prayer in schools say that they are acting less from
political expediency than from deep concern that American society is
out of whack.

Mississippi kids stand by their principal
     Last fall, a soft-spoken but deeply religious principal in inner-city
Jackson, Miss., made national headlines when he was suspended from
his job for allowing his students to read a short prayer over the public
school intercom.
     The principal, Bishop Knox, said his approval of the prayer
followed a 1992 ruling by the 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in
Houston in Jones v. Clearcreek Independent School District, which
concluded that student-initiated prayers, which were non-
proselytizing and nonsectarian, could be read at graduations. The
Supreme Court let the decision stand without comment last June.
     Knox and thousands of lawmakers, as well as Christian legal action
organizations, seized on the ruling. He turned over his school
intercom to the students, who had voted for prayer.
     Most of the new laws closely track the 5th Circuit ruling, giving
students the right to pray, but only if it is voluntary and the students
initiate the benedictions.
     Opponents say they are worried about the separation of church and
state, which has been broadly applied to school prayer by Supreme
Court rulings since its 1962 decision in Engel v. Vitale. The 5th Circuit
ruling sanctioning student-initiated prayer applies only to Texas,
Louisiana and Mississippi.
     The prayer read over the intercom at Jackson's Wingfield High
School just before Thanksgiving was short and simple. But for many
parents, students and teachers here, it was the beginning of an open
revolt against federal prohibitions on school prayer.
     Thousands of students in 15 Mississippi counties, many with the
support of their teachers and superintendents, walked out of class in
the weeks that followed to protest court-mandated sanctions against
school prayer.
     Parents and students, black and white, gathered at large rallies at
the state Capitol to register their support for the soft-spoken and
bespectacled principal of Wingfield High, Bishop Knox, who was
relieved of his duties after allowing his students to read the 21-word
prayer that mentioned God, but not Jesus Christ.
     After a volatile hearing before the Jackson school board, Knox's
termination was overturned, and instead the principal and former
coach was suspended without pay until the next school year. Knox
said he is disappointed with the compromise decision and not certain
he will return.

'People woke up; this is just plain wrong'
     "When you get a man fired for allowing school prayer, people woke
up to the fact that this is just plain wrong and we're not going to take
it anymore," said Bobby Clanton, president of a conservative political
action group here.
     The prayer at Wingfield and suspension of Knox tapped deep
religious feelings here and anxieties over what many see as worsening
conditions in the schools. Leaders of the protests say they are creating
a potent coalition of whites and blacks to fight for the return of
prayer. Religious and conservative groups around the country are
watching to see what happens here.
     The furor over school prayer was stoked by Gov. Kirk Fordice, who
openly supported Knox. "Who says prayer in school is illegal?" said
Fordice, saying the public sees a "jarring, shattering irony ╔ You've
got every kind of blasphemy in schools -- improper language, pistols,
sexual conduct" -- but no prayer.
     Many parents, students and teachers echoed Fordice's comments
that schools around the country are "out of control" and that a simple
prayer in the classroom could help bring back what Knox described as
"a sense of decorum and order and an acknowledgment that
something bigger than us exists -- a Creator."

ACLU upset; officials unafraid of them
     Even before the current furor in Mississippi, many schools there
allowed or endorsed school prayer in the classroom, at Friday night
football games, at graduation ceremonies and in Bible clubs.
     "They're violating it left and right all over the state," said Lynn
Watkins, director of the Mississippi American Civil Liberties Union.
"We've got a lot of school boards that basically have concluded, 'We
don't care what the law is, we're going to have public prayer.'"
     Billy Moss, superintendent of Jones County schools in south
Mississippi, said prayer is common in his schools. Moss supported the
students and teachers who walked out of class over the prayer ban.
     "These students have rights, but sometimes we as adults forget
about them," Jones said. "I don't want to go against the Constitution,
but I think Dr. Knox is right."
     Knox said he believes allowing his students to recite a short prayer
over the school intercom was not only right, but legal.
     Knox said he was approached by students who wanted to recite a
prayer over the intercom. The school put the issue to a student vote,
and prayer won, 490 to 96. The prayer was written and read by
students. The prayer was read for three days before Knox was
suspended for insubordination by his superior, Jackson school
superintendent Ben Canada.
     Knox said he was satisfied that the prayer met the requirements of
the 5th Circuit ruling. The principal, a Christian, said a short prayer at
the beginning of the school day "sets the tone" and "gives a sense of
purpose."
     "Some people are saying we were forcing prayer on students, but
that is not correct," Knox said. "It was not state-directed. It was not a
formal religious exercise. The students weren't asked to bow their
heads or close their eyes or do anything."
     Adam Watson, a ninth-grader who walked out three times at
Wingfield High in support of prayer and Knox, said, "We didn't even
hear the prayer until the third day because all the kids were talking."
Watson, 14, and his parents are considering suing the Jackson school
district, citing a loss of religious and speech freedoms.
     How can this debate even be occurring in America? How low have
we sunk?
     "A few months ago, I lunched with a friend who now lives in Asia.
My friend observed that while the world still regards the United States
as the leading economic and military power on earth, this same world
no longer beholds us with the same moral respect it once did," says
William J. Bennett, the U.S. Secretary of Education under President
Reagan. "Instead, it sees a society in decline."

African won't  raise his kids here
     Writing in the April 1994 Reader's Digest, Bennett told of talking
with a Washington, D.C., cab driver -- a graduate student from Africa.
"He told me that when he receives his degree, he is returning to his
homeland. He doesn't want his children to grow up in a country
where his daughter will be an "easy target" for young men and where
his son might be a target for violence. "It is more civilized where I
come from," he said.
     What a pathetic commentary on our nation. Yet, since 1960, while
America's gross domestic product has tripled, violent crime has
increased 560 percent. Divorces have more than doubled. And by the
end of the decade, 40 percent of all American births and 80 percent of
minority births will occur out of wedlock, notes Bennett. The United
States leads the industrialized world in murder, rape and other violent
crime.
     "There is a coarseness, a callousness and a cynicism to our era,"
wrote Bennett. "Our culture seems almost dedicated to the corruption
of our young. People are losing their capacity for shock, disgust and
outrage. What's to blame for this change? The hard fact is it is
something we have done to ourselves. Thoughtful people have
pointed to materialism, an overly permissive society, or the legacy of
the 1960s. In my view, the crisis is spiritual.
     "There is a disturbing reluctance to talk seriously about matters
spiritual and religious. One will often hear that religious faith is a
private matter. But the Russian novelist Dostoyevsky reminded us
that 'if God does not exist, everything is permissible.'
     "Much of society ridicules and mocks those who are serious about
their faith. America's only respectable bigotry is bigotry against
religious people. And the only reason for hatred of religion is that it
forces us to confront matters many would prefer to ignore.
     "What can be done? For one, we must connect public policies to
our deepest beliefs. Right now we say one thing and do another. We
say we want law and order, but we allow violent criminals to return to
the streets. We say we want to discourage teen-age sex, but educators
treat teen-agers as if they were animals in heat, and are more eager to
dispense condoms than moral guidance. We say we want a color-blind
society, but we count people by race.
     "Most important," says Bennett, "the solution to our chief problem
of spiritual impoverishment depends on spiritual renewal. America
desperately needs to recover the purpose of education, which is to
provide for the intellectual and moral education of the young. Plato
made the point that good education makes good men, and good men
act nobly.
     "We must carry on a new struggle for the country we love. If we
have full employment and greater economic growth -- if we have
cities of gold and alabaster -- but our children have not learned how to
walk in goodness, justice and mercy, then the American experiment
will have failed."
     What does the Bible say that we should do? "Train a child in the way
he should go, and when he is old he will not turn from it," promises
Proverbs 22:6.
     "I suppose that most professing Christians are acquainted with this
verse," wrote the great Christian preacher J.C. Ryle almost 100 years
ago. "The sound of it is probably familiar to your ears, like an old tune.
It is likely you have heard it, or read it, talked of it, or quoted it, many
a time.
     "But, after all, how little is the substance of this text regarded! The
doctrine it contains appears scarcely known. The duty it puts before
us seems seldom practiced."
     A century ago, Ryle wrote that "we live in days when there is a
great zeal for education. We are told of new teaching systems, and
new books for the young. Yet, still for all this, the vast majority of
children are not trained in the way they should go, for when they
grow up to an adult, they do not walk with God. How shall we account
for this state of affairs? The plain truth is, we have ignored the Lord's
commandment. Therefore, the Lord's promise is not fulfilled.
     You have a clear promise on your side, said Ryle: "Train a child in
the way he should go, and when he is old he will not turn from it."
     "Think what it is to have a promise like this, challenged Ryle.
"Promises are the gracious hope which in every age have supported
and strengthened the believer. Fathers and mothers, when your
hearts are failing and ready to stop, look at the word of this text, and
take comfort.
     "Think of who it is that promises. It is the word of the King of
Kings, who never changes. Has He said anything that He will not do?
Or has He spoken, and will He not make it good? Nothing too hard for
Him to perform. The things that are impossible with men are
possible with God. If we don't get the benefit of the promise we are
dwelling upon, the fault is not in Him, but in ourselves.
     "Cast your bread upon the waters," says Ecclesiastes 11:1, "for after
many days you will find it again."
     The Lord is not talking about soggy bread. He is telling us to teach
our children. To let them pray. To save this great nation.

     WHAT IS CHRISTIAN CRUSADE NEWSPAPER?
      Christian Crusade Newspaper is in its
42nd year as a monthly voice of Christian conservativism.
It has a worldwide circulation and is published by
Christian Crusade, P.O. Box 977, Tulsa, OK 74102.
     The newspaper is distributed free -- without charge -- to
subscribers as a result of the conviction of its founder, Dr.
Billy James Hargis, that he was not to put a price-tag on
the gospel. For your free subscription, just ask.
     Dr. Hargis can be E-mailed a number of ways:
          on America On Line as BJHargis,
          via the Internet as [e-mail] ,
          on Compuserve at 72204,541, and
          on GEnie via K.Wilkerson3.